CWE-301 - Reflection Attack in an Authentication Protocol
- Abstraction:Base
- Structure:Simple
- Status:Draft
- Release Date:2006-07-19
- Latest Modification Date:2023-06-29
Weakness Name
Reflection Attack in an Authentication Protocol
Description
Simple authentication protocols are subject to reflection attacks if a malicious user can use the target machine to impersonate a trusted user.
A mutual authentication protocol requires each party to respond to a random challenge by the other party by encrypting it with a pre-shared key. Often, however, such protocols employ the same pre-shared key for communication with a number of different entities. A malicious user or an attacker can easily compromise this protocol without possessing the correct key by employing a reflection attack on the protocol. Reflection attacks capitalize on mutual authentication schemes in order to trick the target into revealing the secret shared between it and another valid user. In a basic mutual-authentication scheme, a secret is known to both the valid user and the server; this allows them to authenticate. In order that they may verify this shared secret without sending it plainly over the wire, they utilize a Diffie-Hellman-style scheme in which they each pick a value, then request the hash of that value as keyed by the shared secret. In a reflection attack, the attacker claims to be a valid user and requests the hash of a random value from the server. When the server returns this value and requests its own value to be hashed, the attacker opens another connection to the server. This time, the hash requested by the attacker is the value which the server requested in the first connection. When the server returns this hashed value, it is used in the first connection, authenticating the attacker successfully as the impersonated valid user.
Common Consequences
Scope: Access Control
Impact: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Notes: The primary result of reflection attacks is successful authentication with a target machine -- as an impersonated user.
Related Weaknesses
Oracle denies breach after hacker claims theft of 6 million data records
Oracle Health breach compromises patient data at US hospitals
CrushFTP: Patch critical vulnerability ASAP! (CVE-2025-2825)
Russian Hackers Exploit CVE-2025-26633 via MSC EvilTwin to Deploy SilentPrism and DarkWisp
CosmicSting flaw impacts 75% of Adobe Commerce, Magento sites
New SuperBlack ransomware exploits Fortinet auth bypass flaws
Attackers are targeting CrushFTP vulnerability with public PoC (CVE-2025-2825)
RANsacked: Over 100 Security Flaws Found in LTE and 5G Network Implementations
CVE-2024-20439 Cisco Smart Licensing Utility Static Credential Vulnerability
CVE-2025-2783 Google Chromium Mojo Sandbox Escape Vulnerability
CVE-2019-9874 Sitecore CMS and Experience Platform (XP) Deserialization Vulnerability
CVE-2019-9875 Sitecore CMS and Experience Platform (XP) Deserialization Vulnerability
CVE-2025-30154 reviewdog/action-setup GitHub Action Embedded Malicious Code Vulnerability
CVE-2025-1316 Edimax IC-7100 IP Camera OS Command Injection Vulnerability
CVE-2024-48248 NAKIVO Backup and Replication Absolute Path Traversal Vulnerability
CVE-2017-12637 SAP NetWeaver Directory Traversal Vulnerability
CVE-2025-24472 Fortinet FortiOS and FortiProxy Authentication Bypass Vulnerability
InformationalContent-Type Header Missing
InformationalServer Leaks its Webserver Application via "Server" HTTP Response Header Field
HighPath Traversal
MediumFormat String Error