CWE-1292 - Incorrect Conversion of Security Identifiers
- Abstraction:Base
- Structure:Simple
- Status:Draft
- Release Date:2020-08-20
- Latest Modification Date:2023-06-29
Weakness Name
Incorrect Conversion of Security Identifiers
Description
The product implements a conversion mechanism to map certain bus-transaction signals to security identifiers. However, if the conversion is incorrectly implemented, untrusted agents can gain unauthorized access to the asset.
In a System-On-Chip (SoC), various integrated circuits and hardware engines generate transactions such as to access (reads/writes) assets or perform certain actions (e.g., reset, fetch, compute, etc.). Among various types of message information, a typical transaction is comprised of source identity (to identify the originator of the transaction) and a destination identity (to route the transaction to the respective entity). Sometimes the transactions are qualified with a security identifier. This security identifier helps the destination agent decide on the set of allowed actions (e.g., access an asset for read and writes). A typical bus connects several leader and follower agents. Some follower agents implement bus protocols differently from leader agents. A protocol conversion happens at a bridge to seamlessly connect different protocols on the bus. One example is a system that implements a leader with the Advanced High-performance Bus (AHB) protocol and a follower with the Open-Core Protocol (OCP). A bridge AHB-to-OCP is needed to translate the transaction from one form to the other. A common weakness that can exist in this scenario is that this conversion between protocols is implemented incorrectly, whereupon an untrusted agent may gain unauthorized access to an asset.
Common Consequences
Scope: Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access Control
Impact: Modify Memory, Read Memory, DoS: Resource Consumption (Other), Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Quality Degradation
Related Weaknesses
Oracle Health breach compromises patient data at US hospitals
Oracle denies breach after hacker claims theft of 6 million data records
Attackers are targeting CrushFTP vulnerability with public PoC (CVE-2025-2825)
We Smell a (DC)Rat: Revealing a Sophisticated Malware Delivery Chain
Russian Hackers Exploit CVE-2025-26633 via MSC EvilTwin to Deploy SilentPrism and DarkWisp
CrushFTP: Patch critical vulnerability ASAP! (CVE-2025-2825)
PoisonSeed phishing campaign behind emails with wallet seed phrases
CVE-2024-20439 Cisco Smart Licensing Utility Static Credential Vulnerability
CVE-2025-2783 Google Chromium Mojo Sandbox Escape Vulnerability
CVE-2019-9874 Sitecore CMS and Experience Platform (XP) Deserialization Vulnerability
CVE-2019-9875 Sitecore CMS and Experience Platform (XP) Deserialization Vulnerability
CVE-2025-30154 reviewdog/action-setup GitHub Action Embedded Malicious Code Vulnerability
CVE-2025-1316 Edimax IC-7100 IP Camera OS Command Injection Vulnerability
CVE-2024-48248 NAKIVO Backup and Replication Absolute Path Traversal Vulnerability
CVE-2017-12637 SAP NetWeaver Directory Traversal Vulnerability
CVE-2025-24472 Fortinet FortiOS and FortiProxy Authentication Bypass Vulnerability
CWE-1233 Security-Sensitive Hardware Controls with Missing Lock Bit Protection
CWE-1256 Improper Restriction of Software Interfaces to Hardware Features
HighCWE-772 Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
CWE-303 Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm
CWE-435 Improper Interaction Between Multiple Correctly-Behaving Entities