CWE-1249 - Application-Level Admin Tool with Inconsistent View of Underlying Operating System
- Abstraction:Base
- Structure:Simple
- Status:Incomplete
- Release Date:2020-02-24
- Latest Modification Date:2023-06-29
Weakness Name
Application-Level Admin Tool with Inconsistent View of Underlying Operating System
Description
The product provides an application for administrators to manage parts of the underlying operating system, but the application does not accurately identify all of the relevant entities or resources that exist in the OS; that is, the application's model of the OS's state is inconsistent with the OS's actual state.
Many products provide web-based applications or other interfaces for managing the underlying operating system. This is common with cloud, network access devices, home networking, and other systems. When the management tool does not accurately represent what is in the OS - such as user accounts - then the administrator might not see suspicious activities that would be noticed otherwise. For example, numerous systems utilize a web front-end for administrative control. They also offer the ability to add, alter, and drop users with various privileges as it relates to the functionality of the system. A potential architectural weakness may exist where the user information reflected in the web interface does not mirror the users in the underlying operating system. Many web UI or REST APIs use the underlying operating system for authentication; the system's logic may also track an additional set of user capabilities within configuration files and datasets for authorization capabilities. When there is a discrepancy between the user information in the UI or REST API's interface system and the underlying operating system's user listing, this may introduce a weakness into the system. For example, if an attacker compromises the OS and adds a new user account - a "ghost" account - then the attacker could escape detection if the management tool does not list the newly-added account. This discrepancy could be exploited in several ways: Many of these attacker scenarios can be realized by leveraging separate vulnerabilities related to XSS, command injection, authentication bypass, or logic flaws on the various systems.
Common Consequences
Scope: Access Control
Impact: Varies by Context
Scope: Accountability
Impact: Hide Activities
Scope: Other
Impact: Unexpected State
Related Weaknesses
CWE-1250Improper Preservation of Consistency Between Independent Representations of Shared State
Oracle denies breach after hacker claims theft of 6 million data records
Oracle Health breach compromises patient data at US hospitals
Attackers are targeting CrushFTP vulnerability with public PoC (CVE-2025-2825)
Russian Hackers Exploit CVE-2025-26633 via MSC EvilTwin to Deploy SilentPrism and DarkWisp
CosmicSting flaw impacts 75% of Adobe Commerce, Magento sites
CrushFTP: Patch critical vulnerability ASAP! (CVE-2025-2825)
RANsacked: Over 100 Security Flaws Found in LTE and 5G Network Implementations
Employee charged with stealing unreleased movies, sharing them online
CVE-2025-22224 VMware ESXi and Workstation TOCTOU Race Condition Vulnerability
CVE-2025-2783 Google Chromium Mojo Sandbox Escape Vulnerability
CVE-2020-29574 CyberoamOS (CROS) SQL Injection Vulnerability
CVE-2022-43769 Hitachi Vantara Pentaho BA Server Special Element Injection Vulnerability
CVE-2022-43939 Hitachi Vantara Pentaho BA Server Authorization Bypass Vulnerability
CVE-2018-8639 Microsoft Windows Win32k Improper Resource Shutdown or Release Vulnerability
CVE-2024-40890 Zyxel DSL CPE OS Command Injection Vulnerability
CVE-2024-49035 Microsoft Partner Center Improper Access Control Vulnerability
CVE-2017-0148 Microsoft SMBv1 Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
InformationalInformation Disclosure - Suspicious Comments
InformationalRe-examine Cache-control Directives